|
Genetic Modification (GMO)
|
Many
questions and concerns have arisen with the
new found plant breeding technology termed genetic modification or
commonly referred to as GMO.
Concerns and questions about long term effects
and societal good have caused slowed acceptance and rigorous testing
of this new
technology. Although slowly being adapted, many benefits
are already being realized by today's society.
GMOs
are protecting the environment.
Discoveries in biotechnology have allowed some crops to have their own protection
against insects and disease and, therefore, can be grown using less crop protection
chemicals. For example, cotton and corn now can resist some destructive insects
on their own. This allows farmers to choose the best combination of tools to
control harmful pests and diseases. Biotechnology is providing opportunities
to decrease soil erosion and greenhouse gas emissions through farming practices
that protect the environment. Some of these new crops require less tilling, helping
to preserve precious topsoil, use less fuel and reduce farm run-off into streams
and rivers. They are also playing a part in feeding a growing population. According
to statistics from the Population Division of the United Nations Department of
Economic and Social Affairs, the world population will likely increase to approximately
nine billion by 2050. The fact is that with more people, we will need to provide
more food. At the same time, there is little remaining land for farming, without
destroying valuable rainforest and wetland habitats. World hunger is a complex
issue that biotechnology can play a part in helping. Thanks to continued improvements
in agriculture and food production, and to developments in food biotechnology,
we'll be able to grow more food and better food on land already being farmed.
More nutritious foods are also becoming available as a result of GMOs. Now and
in the near future biotechnology products provide potential food quality improvements.
Some biotech foods may help to prevent heart disease and cancer by delivering
more of vitamins C and E. Research is under way on "golden rice," which
would combat Vitamin A deficiency in developing nations by delivering more beta-carotene
and iron. Other biotech foods under development, such as a potato that absorbs
less oil, may help to prevent heart disease by cutting back on fatty acids. Biotechnology
will improve nutrition in other ways, such as by producing allergy-free peanuts
and rice. Researchers are even working on a banana that could deliver vaccines
against Hepatitis B and other deadly diseases. |
1. What are genetically-modified plants and foods?
The term GM foods or GMOs (genetically-modified organisms) is most
commonly used to refer to crop plants created for human or animal
consumption using the latest molecular biology techniques. Genetic
modification covers such diverse activities as the use of yeast in
brewing or bread making to advanced plant breeding techniques. New
developments in biotechnology allow scientists to identify and transfer
the specific gene that creates a desired trait in a plant, and offer a
more precise way to produce plants with certain beneficial
characteristics - such as greater nutrition.
2. How many plants are genetically modified?
According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA), there are over 40 plant
varieties that have completed all of the federal requirements for
commercialization. Some examples of these plants include tomatoes and
cantalopes that have modified ripening characteristics, soybeans, canola
and sugarbeets that are resistant to herbicides, and corn and cotton
plants with increased resistance to insect pests.
The seven transgenic crops grown worldwide in 1999 were, in descending
order of area, soybean, corn/maize, cotton, canola/rapeseed, potato,
squash and papaya. Transgenic soybean and corn continued to be ranked
first and second in 1999, accounting for 54 % and 28 % of global
transgenic crop area, respectively. Cotton (9.1 million acres) and
canola (8.4 million acres) shared third ranking position in 1999 each
occupying approximately 9 % of global area. Potato, squash and papaya
occupied less than 1% of the global area of transgenic crops in 1999.
3. Where are genetically-modified crops grown?
Between 1996 and 1999, twelve countries, 8 industrial and 4 developing,
have contributed to more than a twenty-fold increase in the global area
of transgenic crops. Adoption rates for transgenic crops are
unprecedented and are the highest for any new technologies by
agricultural industry standards.
In 1999, the global area of transgenic crops increased by 44 %, or 29.9
million acres, to 98.6 million acres, from 68.7 million acres in 1998 .
Seven transgenic crops were grown commercially in twelve countries in
1999 three of which, Portugal, Rumania and Ukraine, grew transgenic
crops for the first time.
The countries listed in descending order of transgenic crop area on a
global basis in 1999 are: USA, 70.9 million acres, or 72 % of the global
area; Argentina with 16.6 million acres equivalent to 17 % of global
area; Canada 9.9 million acres representing 10 %; China with
approximately 0.7 million hectares equivalent to 1 %; Australia and
South Africa each grew 0.2 million acres of transgenic crops in 1999.
The balance of <1 % was grown in Mexico, Spain, France, Portugal,
Rumania and Ukraine, each with < 0.2 million acres.
4. What percent of crops in the US are genetically-modified?
In the U.S. approximately 57% of all soybeans cultivated in 1999 were
genetically-modified, up from 42% in 1998 and only 7% in 1996. Bt corn
and Bt cotton also experienced similar but less dramatic increases. Bt
corn production increased to 30% of all corn grown in 1999, from 26% in
1998, and 1.5% in 1996. Bt cotton was 27% of the total crop in 1999, up
from 23% in 1998, and 19% in 1996. As anticipated, pesticide and
herbicide use on these GM varieties was slashed and, for the most part,
yields were increased.
5. Why genetically modified breeding verse traditional methods?
The enhancement of desired traits has traditionally been undertaken
through breeding, but conventional plant breeding methods can be very
time consuming and are often not very accurate. Genetic engineering, on
the other hand, can create plants with the exact desired trait very
rapidly and with great accuracy. For example, plant geneticists can
isolate a gene responsible for drought tolerance and insert that gene
into a different plant. The new genetically-modified plant will gain
drought tolerance as well. Not only can genes be transferred from one
plant to another, but genes from non-plant organisms also can be used.
The best known example of this is the use of Bt genes in corn and other
crops. Bt, or Bacillus thuringiensis, is a naturally occurring bacterium
that produces crystal proteins that are lethal to insect larvae. Bt
crystal protein genes have been transferred into corn, enabling the corn
to produce its own pesticides against insects such as the European corn
borer.
6. What are some of the advantages of GM foods?
The world population has topped 6 billion people and is predicted to
increase by 50% in the next 50 years. Ensuring an adequate food supply
for this booming population is going to be a major challenge in the
years to come. GM foods hold promise to meet this need in a number of
ways:
| |
Pest resistance
Crop losses from insect pests can be staggering,
resulting in devastating financial loss for farmers and starvation in
developing countries. Growing GM foods such as BT corn can help
eliminate the application of chemical pesticides and reduce the cost of
bringing a crop to market.
Herbicide tolerance
For some crops, it is not cost-effective to
remove weeds by physical means such as tilling, so farmers will often
spray herbicides to destroy weeds, a time-consuming and expensive
process. Crop plants genetically-engineered to be resistant to one very
powerful herbicide could help prevent environmental damage by reducing
the amount of herbicides needed. For example, Monsanto has created a
strain of soybeans genetically modified to be not affected by their
herbicide product Roundup ®. A farmer grows these soybeans which then
only require one application of weed-killer instead of multiple
applications, reducing production cost and limiting the dangers of
agricultural waste run-off.
Disease resistance
There are many viruses, fungi and bacteria that
cause plant diseases. Plant biologists are working to create plants with
genetically-engineered resistance to these diseases.
? Cold tolerance Unexpected frost can destroy sensitive seedlings. An
antifreeze gene from cold water fish has been introduced into plants
such as tobacco and potato. With this antifreeze gene, these plants are
able to tolerate cold temperatures that normally would kill unmodified
seedlings.
Drought tolerance/salinity tolerance
As the world population grows
and more land is utilized for housing instead of food production,
farmers will need to grow crops in locations previously unsuited for
plant cultivation. Creating plants that can withstand long periods of
drought or high salt content in soil and groundwater will help people to
grow crops in formerly inhospitable places.
Nutrition
Malnutrition is common in third world countries where
impoverished people rely on a single crop such as rice for the main
staple of their diet. However, rice does not contain adequate amounts of
all necessary nutrients to prevent malnutrition. If rice could be
genetically engineered to contain additional vitamins and minerals,
nutrient deficiencies could be alleviated. For example, blindness due to
vitamin A deficiency is a common problem in third world countries.
Researchers at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Institute for
Plant Sciences have created a strain of "golden" rice containing an
unusually high content of beta-carotene (vitamin A). Since this rice was
funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, a non-profit organization, the
Institute hopes to offer the golden rice seed free to any third world
country that requests it. Plans were underway to develop a golden rice
that also has increased iron content. However, the grant that funded the
creation of these two rice strains was not renewed, perhaps because of
the vigorous anti-GM food protesting in Europe, and so this
nutritionally-enhanced rice may not come to market at all.
Pharmaceuticals
Medicines and vaccines often are costly to produce
and sometimes require special storage conditions not readily available
in third world countries. Researchers are working to develop edible
vaccines in tomatoes and potatoes. These vaccines will be much easier to
ship, store and administer than traditional injectable vaccines.
Phytoremediation
Not all GM plants are grown as crops. Soil and
groundwater pollution continues to be a problem in all parts of the
world. Plants such as poplar trees have been genetically engineered to
clean up heavy metal pollution from contaminated soil.
|
7. What are some of the criticisms of GM foods?
Most concerns about GM foods fall into three categories: environmental
hazards, human health risks, and economic concerns.
| |
Environmental hazards
Unintended harm to other organisms
Last year a study was published in
Nature showing that pollen from Bt corn caused high mortality rates in
monarch butterfly caterpillars. Monarch caterpillars consume milkweed
plants, not corn, but pollen from Bt corn was blown by the wind onto
milkweed plants in neighboring fields where the caterpillars ate the
pollen and many perished. Unfortunately, Bt toxins kill many species of
insect larvae indiscriminately; it is not possible to design a Bt toxin
that would only kill crop-damaging pests and remain harmless to all
other insects. This study is being reexamined by the USDA, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other non-government research
groups, and preliminary data from new studies suggests that the original
study may have been flawed.
Reduced effectiveness of pesticides
Just as some populations of
mosquitoes developed resistance to the now-banned pesticide DDT, many
people are concerned that insects will become resistant to Bt or other
crops that have been genetically-modified to produce their own
pesticides.
Gene transfer to non-target species
Another concern is that crop plants
engineered for herbicide tolerance and weeds will cross-breed, resulting
in the transfer of the herbicide resistance genes from the crops into
the weeds. These "superweeds" would then be herbicide tolerant as well.
Other introduced genes may cross over into non-modified crops planted
next to GM crops.
Possible Solutions
Genes are exchanged between plants via pollen. Two ways to ensure
that non-target species will not receive introduced genes from GM plants
are to create GM plants that are male sterile (do not produce pollen) or
to modify the GM plant so that the pollen does not contain the
introduced gene. Cross-pollination would not occur, and if harmless
insects such as monarch caterpillars were to eat pollen from GM plants,
the caterpillars would survive.
Another possible solution is to create buffer zones around fields of GM
crops. For example, non-GM corn would be planted to surround a field of
Bt GM corn, and the non-GM corn would not be harvested. Beneficial or
harmless insects would have a refuge in the non-GM corn, and insect
pests could be allowed to destroy the non-GM corn and would not develop
resistance to Bt pesticides. Gene transfer to weeds and other crops
would not occur because the wind-blown pollen would not travel beyond
the buffer zone. Estimates of the necessary width of buffer zones range
from 6 meters to 30 meters or more. This planting method may not be
feasible if too much acreage is required for the buffer zones.
Human health risks
Allergenicity
Many children in the US and Europe have developed
life-threatening allergies to peanuts and other foods. There is a
possibility that introducing a gene into a plant may create a new
allergen, or cause an allergic reaction in susceptible individuals.
Unknown effects on human health
There is a growing concern that
introducing foreign genes into food plants may have an unexpected and
negative impact on human health. Critics say that this paper, like the
monarch butterfly data, is flawed and does not hold up to scientific
scrutiny. Moreover, the gene introduced into the potatoes was a snowdrop
flower lectin, a substance known to be toxic to mammals. The scientists
who created this variety of potato chose to use the lectin gene simply
to test the methodology, and these potatoes were never intended for
human or animal consumption.
On the whole, with the exception of possible allergenicity, scientists
believe that GM foods do not present a risk to human health.
Economic concerns
Bringing a GM food to market is a lengthy and costly process, and of
course agri-biotech companies wish to ensure a profitable return on
their investment. Many new plant genetic engineering technologies and GM
plants have been patented, and patent infringement is a big concern of
agribusiness. Yet consumer advocates are worried that patenting these
new plant varieties will raise the price of seeds so high that small
farmers and third world countries will not be able to afford seeds for
GM crops, thus widening the gap between the wealthy and the poor. It is
hoped that in a humanitarian gesture, more companies and non-profits
will follow the lead of the Rockefeller Foundation and offer their
products at reduced cost to impoverished nations. |
8. How are GM foods regulated and what is the government's role in this
process?
Governments are hard at work to establish a regulatory process to
monitor the effects of and approve new varieties of GM plants. Yet
depending on the political, social and economic climate within a region
or country, different governments are responding in different ways.
| |
Around the world
In Japan, the Ministry of Health and Welfare has announced that health
testing of GM foods will be mandatory as of April 2001. Currently,
testing of GM foods is voluntary. Japanese supermarkets are offering
both GM foods and unmodified foods, and customers are beginning to show
a strong preference for unmodified fruits and vegetables.
India's government has not yet announced a policy on GM foods because no
GM crops are grown in India and no products are commercially available
in supermarkets yet. India is, however, very supportive of transgenic
plant research. It is highly likely that India will decide that the
benefits of GM foods outweigh the risks because Indian agriculture will
need to adopt drastic new measures to counteract the country's endemic
poverty and feed its exploding population.
Some states in Brazil have banned GM crops entirely, and the Brazilian
Institute for the Defense of Consumers, in collaboration with
Greenpeace, has filed suit to prevent the importation of GM crops.
Brazilian farmers, however, have resorted to smuggling GM soybean seeds
into the country because they fear economic harm if they are unable to
compete in the global marketplace with other grain-exporting countries.
In Europe, anti-GM food protestors have been especially active. In the
last few years Europe has experienced two major foods scares: bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease) in Great Britain and
dioxin-tainted foods originating from Belgium. These food scares have
undermined consumer confidence about the European food supply, and
citizens are disinclined to trust government information about GM foods.
In response to the public outcry, Europe now requires mandatory food
labeling of GM foods in stores, and the European Commission (EC) has
established a 1% threshold for contamination of unmodified foods with GM
food products.
In the United States
Biotech foods are extensively researched and reviewed.
In the United
States, three government agencies - the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), Department of Agriculture (USDA), and Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) as well as many individual state governments - work
together to ensure that crops produced through biotechnology are safe.
Nine Chances to Say No
Biosafety Committee
1. The first opportunity comes almost immediately after a scientist
discovers a potentially marketable product concept. Following guidelines
established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), developers of
biotech products empanel an advisory group (Biosafety Committee) made up
of employees and members of the general public. This panel reviews the
environmental and health possibilities posed by developing the proposed
idea. If the committee determines there is unacceptable risk, it will
recommend that the concept not be developed.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
2. If the concept passes initial considerations, a review must be
conducted to determine if existing research facilities are adequate to
conduct the research. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) must
review and approve facility plans, including greenhouses where the
plants will be developed and tested.
3. The developer must seek USDA approval in order to conduct field
trials.
4. USDA must also give authority for the developer to ship seeds from a
greenhouse to a field trial site.
5. Another formal interface comes after the developer has generated a
full package of data, submits it to USDA and requests a "determination
of non-regulated status," meaning the plant can be grown, tested or used
for traditional crop breeding without further USDA action. During this
formal review process, which normally takes 10 months, USDA publishes an
invitation for public comment in the Federal Register and considers the
comments it receives.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
If a plant is improved to express a protein with pest control
properties, such as insect-protected or virus-protected crops, the
Environmental Protection Agency has oversight during the development and
commercialization phases ˆ a process that lasts many months. In the case
of herbicide-tolerant crops, EPA determines whether applying herbicide
over such crops poses risks to food or feed safety that would require
label extensions, for which detailed residue data are submitted.
6. If a developer plans to plant more than 10 acres of a plant
expressing a pesticidal protein in research or field trials, the EPA
must grant an experimental use permit (EUP). Public comment is invited
through publication in the Federal Register.
7. EPA reviews data on the human, animal and environmental safety of the
pest control protein or pesticidal protein to determine whether limits
(tolerances) should be set on the amount of protein in food derived from
the improved plant. In instances where there is substantial data on the
safety of the protein and a history of safe use, the developer may
request an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, which may or
may not be granted. Public comments are invited through publication in
the Federal Register.
8. The final EPA step is a formal review of the data generated through
years of study. During this final review, which typically takes
approximately 18 months, EPA considers whether or not to register the
product for commercial use. Again, public notification is given and
comments are requested.
9. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is charged with responsibility
for the safety of foods, including those derived from biotech plants and
other novel foods. FDA has established a Food Advisory Committee
comprised of scientific experts and consumer representatives to provide
clear direction on the FDA approval process. FDA meets with a developer
of a biotechnology product early in the process and provides guidance as
to what studies FDA considers appropriate to ensure food and feed
safety. The recommended studies vary, depending on each product and the
products proposed use and function. The interactive FDA involvement in
pre-market review of a biotech food spans several years. At the end of
this process, the FDA provides a letter to the developer confirming that
they have no more questions regarding the food and feed safety of the
product. Even after a product is on the market, FDA has authority, under
the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, to immediately remove from the market
any food that the FDA deems unsafe. FDAs authority is immediate and
final. |
9. How are GM foods labeled?
The FDA's current position on food labeling is governed by the Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act which is only concerned with food additives, not
whole foods or food products that are considered GRAS - generally
recognized as safe. The FDA contends that GM foods are substantially
equivalent to non-GM foods, and therefore not subject to more stringent
labeling. If all GM foods and food products are to be labeled, Congress
must enact sweeping changes in the existing food labeling policy.
In January 2000, an international trade agreement for labeling GM foods
was established. More than 130 countries, including the US, the world's
largest producer of GM foods, signed the agreement. The policy states
that exporters must be required to label all GM foods and that importing
countries have the right to judge for themselves the potential risks and
reject GM foods, if they so choose. This new agreement may spur the U.S.
government to resolve the domestic food labeling dilemma more rapidly.
10. If biotech products are safe, why are biotechnology companies
opposed to labeling them?
Companies are supportive of efforts to ensure that consumers have the
information they need to make sound food decisions. The question of
consumer product labeling is best addressed by the food industry working
in cooperation with regulatory agencies. In the U.S. and Canada, this
cooperative effort has resulted in a science-based system that requires
labeling if the food differs in safety, composition, or nutritional
quality compared to conventional food. No products developed using
biotechnology that are currently on the market fall into this category.
11. What is in the future for genetically-modified crops?
High adoption rates reflect grower satisfaction with the products that
offer significant benefitsranging from more convenient and flexible
crop management, higher productivity or net returns/acre and a safer
environment through decreased use of conventional pesticides, which
collectively contribute to a more sustainable agriculture.
As expansion of transgenic crops continues, a shift will occur from the
current generation of "input" agronomic traits to the next generation of
"output" quality traits, which will result in improved and specialized
nutritional food and feed products that will satisfy a high-value-added
market; this will significantly affect the value of the global
transgenic crop market and also broaden the beneficiary profile from
growers to consumers which could in turn have important implications for
public acceptance. Genetically-modified foods have the potential to
solve many of the world's hunger and malnutrition problems, and to help
protect and preserve the environment by increasing yield and reducing
reliance upon chemical pesticides and herbicides. Yet there are many
challenges ahead for governments, consumers, producers and industry.
|